alternativeАльтернативная энергетика и экология (ISJAEE)Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE)1608-8298Международный издательский дом научной периодики "Спейс10.15518/isjaee.2019.01-03.076-079alternative-1577Research ArticleВОДОРОДНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКАHYDROGEN ECONOMYАЛЬТЕРНАТИВНЫЙ СПОСОБ ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИЯ ЖЕЛЕЗНОЙ РУДЫ В ВОСТОЧНОЙ АМАЗОНИИ*A PROPOSAL OF AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE FOR THE REDUCTION OF IRON ORE IN THE EASTERN AMAZONIAде ЛимаЛ. К.De LimaL. C.

Форталеза, CE 60811-905, США

тел.: +1(55-85)477-3083, факс: +1-55-85-477-3061

Fortaleza, CE 60811-905, USAtel.: +1-55-85-477-3083; fax: +1-55-85-477-3061

luterocl@unifor.brФ. ДуэртеЖ. Б.Furlan DuarteJ. B.

Форталеза, CE 60811-905, США

тел.: +1(55-85)477-3083, факс: +1-55-85-477-3061

Fortaleza, CE 60811-905, USAtel.: +1-55-85-477-3083; fax: +1-55-85-477-3061

ВезироглуТ. Н.VezirogluT. N.

Ph.D. in Heat Transfer, Professor, President of International Association for Hydrogen Energy, a member of 18 scientific organizations.

а/я 248294, Coral Cables, Флорида 33124-0620, СШАтел.: +1(305)284-46-66; факс: +1(305)284-47-92

Ph.D. in Heat Transfer, Professor, President of International Association for Hydrogen Energy, a member of 18 scientific organizations.

Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA

Центр технологий, CCT-UNIFOR, Университет ФорталезыСоединённые Штаты АмерикиCenter of Technological Sciences, CCT-UNIFOR, University of FortalezaUnited StatesИнститут чистой энергии, Университет МайамиСоединённые Штаты АмерикиClean Energy Research Institute, University of MiamiUnited States201924022019001-037679Copyright © Международный издательский дом научной периодики "Спейс, 20192019Международный издательский дом научной периодики "СпейсМеждународный издательский дом научной периодики "Спейсhttps://www.isjaee.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.isjaee.com/jour/article/view/1577

Бразилия сократила использование древесины в форме древесного угля или топливной древесины примерно до 10 % от потребления энергии в 2000 г. Другая ситуация в бразильской Амазонии, где растет спрос на древесный уголь для производства чугуна по проекту «Большой Каражас». Целью настоящего исследования является проверка возможности использования электролитического водорода вместо древесного угля для прямого восстановления железной руды в этом регионе. Рассматриваются технологические, экономические и экологические аспекты. Это исследование может быть полезным как Бразилии в целом, так и Амазонии в частности, поскольку природные ресурсы могут быть сохранены и загрязнение предотвращено.

Brazil has decreased the utilization of wood under the form of either charcoal or fuel wood to about 10% of its energy consumption (year 2000). The same is not true for the Brazilian Amazonia where there is a growing demand of charcoal for the production of pig iron in the Greater Carajas Program. The objective of the present study is to verify the feasibility of using electrolytic hydrogen instead of charcoal for the direct reduction of iron ore in that region. Techno, economic and environmental aspects are considered. This study can be benefcial to Brazil in general and Amazonia in particular since natural resources might be preserved and pollution avoided.

Амазониявосстановление железной руды водородомсохранение природыAmazoniahydrogen iron ore reductionnatural preservationReferencesAbracave—Brazilian Association of Charcoal. Statistical yearbook, 2001.[1] Abracave—Brazilian Association of Charcoal. Statistical yearbook, 2001.De Lima L.C. Readiness of Brazil to be the 8rst country to utilize hydrogen as energy carrier: the Amazon issue. Report to the Clean Energy Research Institute, University of Miami, USA, 1991. 64p.[2] De Lima L.C. Readiness of Brazil to be the 8rst country to utilize hydrogen as energy carrier: the Amazon issue. Report to the Clean Energy Research Institute, University of Miami, USA, 1991. 64p.De Lima L.C., Barbir F., Veziroglu T.N. Electrolytic hydrogen produced steel instead of charcoal produced steel in the Brazilian Amazonia. Ninth World Hydrogen Energy Conference, vol. 3. Paris, France, 22–25 June, 1992. p. 1837–44.[3] De Lima L.C., Barbir F., Veziroglu T.N. Electrolytic hydrogen produced steel instead of charcoal produced steel in the Brazilian Amazonia. Ninth World Hydrogen Energy Conference, vol. 3. Paris, France, 22–25 June, 1992. p. 1837–44.De Lima L.C., Barretos J.C.N. Hydrogen utilization for the reduction of iron ore in the Brazilian Amazonia: prospective natural resources preservation. Fourth International Conference on New Energy Systems and Conversions, Osaka, Japan, 27–30 June, 1999.[4] De Lima L.C., Barretos J.C.N. Hydrogen utilization for the reduction of iron ore in the Brazilian Amazonia: prospective natural resources preservation. Fourth International Conference on New Energy Systems and Conversions, Osaka, Japan, 27–30 June, 1999.World Bank Group, Pollution prevention and abatement handbook: iron and steel manufacturing, draft technical background document. Environment Department, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. p. 328.[5] World Bank Group, Pollution prevention and abatement handbook: iron and steel manufacturing, draft technical background document. Environment Department, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. p. 328.Feinman J. Direct reduction and smelting process. The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999. p. 763–6 [chapter 11].[6] Feinman J. Direct reduction and smelting process. The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999. p. 763–6 [chapter 11].Zervas T., McMullan J.T., Willians B.C. Developments in iron and steel making. Int. J. Energy Res., 1996;20:69–91.[7] Zervas T., McMullan J.T., Willians B.C. Developments in iron and steel making. Int. J. Energy Res., 1996;20:69–91.Tarnay D.S. Hydrogen production at hydro power plants. Hydrogen energy progress, V, vol. I. Toronto, Canada: Pergamon Press, 1984. p. 323–33.[8] Tarnay D.S. Hydrogen production at hydro power plants. Hydrogen energy progress, V, vol. I. Toronto, Canada: Pergamon Press, 1984. p. 323–33.Davis C.G., McFarling J.F., Pratt H.R. Direct reduction technology and economics. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1982;9(3):93–129.[9] Davis C.G., McFarling J.F., Pratt H.R. Direct reduction technology and economics. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1982;9(3):93–129.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.