Preview

Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE)

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

MINI CHP BASED ON THE ELECTROCHEMICAL GENERATOR AND IMPEDED FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR FOR METHANE STEAM REFORMING

https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2017.19-21.095-105

Abstract

The paper presents the scheme of mini CHP with methane reformer and planar solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) stack. The mini CHP produces electricity, superheated steam, hot air and methane for the reformer and it also preheats cathode air used in the SOFC stack as an oxidant. Moreover, the scheme’s mathematical model is constructed. The thermochemical reactor with impeded fluidized bed for autothermal steam reforming of methane (reformer) studied experimentally is the key element in producing synthesis gas – fuel for the SOFC stack. The research indicates that synthesis gas containing 55% of hydrogen can be derived using the reactor. Through mathematical modeling, the entire reactor’s principal dimensions as well as flow rates of air, water and methane were adjusted to the methane reforming for the mini CHP studied. The paper includes the heat balances of the reformer, SOFC stack and waste heat boiler that produces the superheated steam, hot air and methane for the reformer as well as preheated cathode air. These balances were instrumental for calculating the useful product fraction in the reformer, fraction of hydrogen oxidized in the SOFC anode channel, electric gross efficiency, anode temperature, exothermic effect of synthesis gas hydrogen oxidation by air oxygen, excess entropy and Gibbs free energy change at standard conditions, SOFC electromotive force (EMF), specific flow rate of standard fuel for heat, and power generation. The simulation study has shown that the hydrogen oxidation products temperature in the SOFC anode channel is 850ºС, electric gross efficiency 61.0%, single fuel cell EMF 0.985 V, fraction of hydrogen oxidized in the SOFC anode channel 64.6%, specific flow rate of standard fuel for power generation 0.16 kg/(kW·h), for heat generation 44.7 kg/GJ. All the specific parameters are in good agreement with other publications results.

About the Authors

A. M. Dubinin
Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
D.Sc. (engineering), Professor of Power Engineering and Thermal Engineering department


S. E. Sheklein
Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
D.Sc. (engineering), Professor, the Head of Atomic Stations and Renewable Energy Sources department


V. G. Tuponogov
Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
D.Sc. (engineering), Professor at Heat Power Engineering Department


M. I. Ershov
Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
M.Sc. student


References

1. Lykova S.A. Highly efficient hybrid power generation systems based on fuel cells. Thermal Engineering, 2002;49(1):54–60 (in Eng.).

2. Sgobbi A. How far away is hydrogen? Its role in the medium and long-term decarbonisation of the European energy system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016;41(1):19–35 (in Eng.).

3. Grigor'yants R.R. Thermodynamic model and analysis of hybrid power installations built around solidoxide fuel cells and gas-turbine units. Thermal Engineering, 2008;55(9):790–794 (in Eng.).

4. Dubinin A.M. Experimental and theoretical study of the effectiveness of the production of hydrogen by steam conversion of methane using circulating fluidized bed technology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016;41(20):8433–8437 (in Eng.).

5. Dubinin A.M. Modeling the process of producing hydrogen from methane. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2013;47(6):697–701 (in Eng.).

6. Beznosova D.S. Prospects for using hybrid power installations on the basis of solid-oxide fuel cells integrated with intracycle coal gasification. Thermal Engineering, 2011;58(9):774–778 (in Eng.).

7. Dubinin A.M. Determining maximum capacity of an autothermal fluidized-bed gas generator. Thermal Engineering, 2009;56(5):421–425 (in Eng.).

8. Shigarov A.B. Modeling of membrane reactor for steam methane reforming: From granular to structured catalysts. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2012;46(2):97–107 (in Eng.).

9. Kurganov V.A. High-Temperature HeatShielding Panels with Thermochemical Cooling Based on the Reaction of Steam Conversion of Methane. High Temperature, 2000;38(6):926–937 (in Eng.).

10. Lakhete P. Modeling process intensified catalytic plate reactor for synthesis gas production. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014;110:13–19 (in Eng.).

11. Kurteeva A.A. Single solid-oxide fuel cells with supporting Ni-cermet anode. High Temperature, 2011;47(12):1381–1388 (in Eng.).

12. Takeguchi T. Study on steam reforming of CH4 and C2 hydrocarbons and carbon deposition on Ni-YSZ cermets. Journal of Power Sources, 2002;112:588–595 (in Eng.).

13. Chen B. Exergy analysis and CO2 emission evaluation for steam methane reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012;37(4):3191–3200 (in Eng.).

14. Yan Y. Properties of thermodynamic equilibrium-based methane autothermal reforming to generate hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013;38(35):15744–15750 (in Eng.).

15. Dubinin A.M. Mini coal-fired CHP plant on the basis of synthesis gas generator (CO + H2) and electrochemical current generator. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017;42(41):26048–26058 (in Eng.).

16. Barona J. Combustion of hydrogen in a bubbling fluidized bed. Combustion and Flame, 2009;156(5):975– 984 (in Eng.).

17. Korovin N.A. Fuel cells and electrochemical plants (Toplivnye elementy i elektrokhimicheskie ustanovki), Moscow: MPEI, 2005, p. 145 (in Russ.).

18. Baskakov A.P. On mechanism of coal steam gasification (O mekhanizme parovoi gazifikatsii uglya). Industrial Power Engineering, 2008;(4):40–42 (in Russ.).

19. Baskakov A.P. Physics and Chemistry of Thermal Processes (Fiziko-khimicheskie osnovy teplovykh protsessov). Moscow: Teplotehnik, 2013, p.173 (in Russ.).

20. Munts V.A. Studying the characteristics of a 5 kW power installation on solid-oxide fuel cells with steam reforming of natural gas, Thermal Engineering, 2015;62(11):779–784 (in Eng.).

21. Ivanov P.P. Thermodynamic modeling of power plants based on solid oxide fuel cells. High Temperature, 2011;49(4):608–614 (in Eng.).

22. Sobyanin V.A. High temperature solid oxide fuel cells and methane conversion (Vysokotemperaturnye tverdooksidnye toplivnye elementy i konversiya metana). Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2003;47(6):62–70 (in Russ.).

23. Peters R. Analysis of solid oxide fuel cell system concepts with anode recycling, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;(38):6809–6820 (in Eng.).

24. Korovin N.V. Calculating the efficiency of a hybrid power station employing a high-temperature fuel cell, Thermal Engineering, 2007;54(2):137–141 (in Eng.).

25. Baskakov A.P. Optimum chemical regeneration of the gases burnt in solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 2014;87(4):763–772 (in Eng.).

26. Yakovlev B.V. Increase in efficiency of central heating and heat supply systems (Povyshenie effektivnosti sistem teplofikatsii i teplosnabzheniya). Moscow: Novosti teplosnabzheniya, 2008, p.448 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Dubinin A.M., Sheklein S.E., Tuponogov V.G., Ershov M.I. MINI CHP BASED ON THE ELECTROCHEMICAL GENERATOR AND IMPEDED FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR FOR METHANE STEAM REFORMING. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2017;(19-21):95-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2017.19-21.095-105

Views: 1098


ISSN 1608-8298 (Print)