SEMICONDUCTOR GAS SENSORS FOR DETECTION OF CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND TOXIC INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS

The sensors for detection of toxic and chemical warfare agents (CWA) should be sensitive to low concentrations of gases – considerably lower than ones immediately dangerous to life or health concentrations. The paper shortly discusses classical CWAs and toxic industrial sensors; makes a comparison between nuclear weapons and chemical agents and a toxicity comparison between real gases and simulants. Moreover, the paper analyzes the simulants for testing the sensor devices and semiconductor gas sensor' technique; shows sensitivity change with dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) gas concentration for sensor made of SnO₂. The MoO₃, NiO, Al₂O₃, In₂O₃, Pt, ZnO and ZrO₂ additives are reported to exhibit enhanced sensitivity to dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP), and Al2O3, In2O3, ZrO₂ and ZnO additives – to exhibit enhanced sensitivity to dipropyleneglycol methylethylene (DPGME). SnO2 devices with ZrO₂ and ZnO additives exhibit high sensitivity to acetonitrile. The sensors made from Co-doped SnO₂ films demonstrate sensitivity to CWAs such as sarin and yperite. We performed the measurements at the operating temperature of 210 ºC, and found that the sensor exposed comparatively greater concentration of target gas (200 ppm sarin and 100 ppm yperite) and the SnO₂ <Co> sensor was sensitive to yperite starting from 25 ppm. Furthermore, the sensitivities to 50 ppm and 12.5 ppm sarin were found. The paper presents the results of our studies on tin oxide/ multiwall carbon nanotube film nanocomposite sensors of PG, dimethylformamide (DMF) and formaldehyde (FA) using hydrothermal synthesis and sol-gel methods. The investigations of response/recovery characteristics in the 50–300 ^oC operating temperature range reveal that the optimal operating temperature for the PG, DMF and FA vapor sensors, taking into account both high response and acceptable response and recovery times, was 200–220 ºC. A sensor response dependence on gas concentration in all cases was linear. We measured the minimal PG, DMF and FA gas concentrations at which the perceptible signal was registered.

1. Lee D.-D., Kim J.-C Semiconductor gas sensors for chemical warfare agents In: Semiconductor gas sensors (Editors R. Jaaniso and O. Tan ) WP. 2013 Oxford, 467–490.

2. Qing Zhua, Wei-Heng Shiha, Wan Y. Shihb. Enhanced dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) detection sensitivity by lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate/copper piezoelectric microcantilever sensors via Young’s modulus change. Sensors and Actuators B, 2013;182:147–155.

3. Comini E., Baratto C., Concina I. et al. Metal oxide nanoscience and nanotechnology for chemical sensors. Sensors and Actuators B, 2013;179:3–20.

4. Yoo R., Cho S., Min-Jung Song and Lee W. Highly sensitive gas sensor based on Al-doped ZnO nanoparticles fordetection of dimethyl methylphosphonate as a chemical warfareagent stimulant. Sensors and Actuators B, 2015;221:217–223.

5. Aroutiounian V.M., Arakelyan V.M., Aleksanyan M.S. et al. Sensor for Detection of Chemical Agents Made of Co-Doped SnO2. Armenian J. Physics, 2017;9:P122–127.

6. Adamyan Z. N., Sayunts A., Aroutiounian V. et al. Study of Propylene Glycol, Dimethylformamide and Formaldehyde Vapors Sensors Based on MWCNTs/SnO2 Nanocomposites. Sensors & Transducers, 2017;213:38–45.

7. Adamyan Z. N., Sayunts A., Aroutiounian V.et al. AMA-Conferences Proc_SENSOR-2017 P5.5. MWCNTs/SnO2 Harmful Gas Sensors, 2017, pp. 708–713.

8. Alizadeh T., Soltani L.H. Reduced graphene oxide-based gas sensor array for pattern recognition of DMMP vapor. Sensors and Actuators B, 2016;234:361–367.

9. Patil L.A., Bari A.R., Shinde M.D. et al. Detection of dimethyl methyl phosphonate – a simulant of sarin: The highly toxic chemical warfare – using platinum activated nanocrystalline ZnO thick films. Sensors and Actuators B, 2012;161:372–378.

10. Lee S.C., H.Y. Choi, S.J. Lee et al. The development of SnO2-based recoverable gas sensors for the detection of DMMP. Sensors and Actuators B, 2009;137:239–245.

11. Choi N.J., Kwak J.H, Lim Y.T. et al. Devices and chemical sensing applications of metal oxide nanowires. Sensors and Actuators B, 2005;108:298-306.

12. Lee S.C., Kim S.Y., Lee W.S. et al. Effects of Textural Properties on the Response of a SnO2-Based Gas Sensor for the Detection of Chemical Warfare Agents. Sensors, 2011;11:6893–6902.

13. Liu L., Zhang Y., Wang G., et al. Nano-composite sensors composed of single-walled carbon nanotubes and polyaniline for the detection of a nerve agent simulant gas. Sensors and Actuators B, 2011;160:448–456.

14. Dar G.N., Metal Oxide Nanostructures and Their Applications Thesis, Patras, Greece, 2013, p. 154.

15. Chen T., Liu Q.J., Zhou Z. L. and Wang Y.D. A high sensitivity gas sensor for formaldehyde based on CdO and In2O3 doped nanocrystalline SnO2 Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology, 2008;19:095506.

16. Yang Sh,. Liu Yu, Chen W. et al. High sensitivity and good selectivity of ultralong MoO3 nanobelts fortrimethylamine gas. Sensors and Actuators B, 2016;226:478–487.

17. Xing R., Xu L., Yong-sheng Zhu et al. Three-dimensional ordered SnO2inverse opals for superior- formaldehyde gas-sensing performance. Sensors and Actuators B, 2013;188:235–247.

18. Lin Shiwe, Jian WuAkba S.A. A selective room temperature formaldehyde gas sensor using TiO2 nanotube arrays. Sensors and Actuators B, 2011;156:505–512.

19. Castro-Hurtado I., Herrán J., Mandayo G.G. and Castaño E. Studies of influence of structural properties and thickness of NiO thin films on formaldehyde detection. Thin Solid Films, 2011;520:947–955.

20. Aroutiounian V.M. Gas sensors based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Journal of Contemporary Physics, 2015;50:333–390.

21. Adamyan Z., Sayunts A., Aroutiounian V. et al. Nanocomposite sensors of propylene glycol, dimethylformamide and formaldehyde vapors. J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 2018;7:31–41.