Evaluation of System Effectiveness of Multifunctional Hydrogen Complex at Nuclear Power Plants

The paper gives the analysis of the problem of the primary current frequency regulation in the power system, as well as the basic requirements for NPP power units under the conditions of involvement in the primary regulation. According to these requirements, the operation of NPPs is associated with unloading and a corresponding decrease in efficiency. In this regard, the combination of nuclear power plants with a hydrogen complex is shown to eliminate the inefficient discharge mode which allows the steam turbine equipment and equipment of the reactor facility to operate in the basic mode at the nominal power level. In addition, conditions are created for the generation and accumulation of hydrogen and oxygen during the day, as well as additionally during the nighttime failure of the electrical load which allows them to be used to generate peak power.  The purpose of the article is to assess the systemic economic effect as a result of the participation of nuclear power plants in combination with the hydrogen complex in the primary control of the current frequency in the power sys-tem, taking into account the resource costs of the main equipment. In this regard, the paper gives the justification of cyclic loading of the main equipment of the hydrogen complex: metal storage tanks of hydrogen and oxygen, compressor units, hydrogen-oxygen combustion chamber of vapor-hydrogen overheating of the working fluid in the steam turbine cycle of a nuclear power plant. The methodological foundations for evaluating the working life of equipment under cyclic loading with the participation in the primary frequency control by the criterion of the growth rate of a fatigue crack are described. For the equipment of the hydrogen complex, the highest intensity of loading is shown to occur in the hydrogen-oxygen combustion chamber due to high thermal stresses.  The system economic effect is estimated and the effect of wear of the main equipment under cyclic loading is shown. Under the conditions of combining NPP power units with a hydrogen complex, the efficiency of primary reg-ulation is shown to depend significantly on: the cost of equipment subjected to cyclic loading; frequency and intensity of cyclic loading; the ratio of the tariff for peak electricity, and the cost of electricity of nuclear power plants.  Based on the developed methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the participation of nuclear power plants with a hydrogen complex in the primary frequency control, taking into account the damage to the equipment, the use of the hydrogen complex is shown to provide a tangible economic effect compared with the option of unloading nuclear power plants with direct participation in frequency control.

nuclear power plant, hydrogen energy complex, frequency regulation, fatigue failure, cyclic loading frequency, economic effect

1. Strategy Energy of Russia on Period Till 2035 year (Energeticheskaya strategiya Rossii na period do 2035). The Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation (Ministerstvo energetiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii). Moscow, 2014 (in Russ.).

2. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A.N. Combination of hydrogen energy cycles with nuclear power plants (Kombinirovanie vodorodnyh energeticheskih tsiklov s atomnymi elektrostantsiyami). Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2016 (in Russ.).

3. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A.N. Performance evaluation of hydrogen production based on off-peak electric energy of the nuclear power plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017;42:21617–21625.

4. Aminov R.Z., Schastlivtsev A.I., Bairamov A.N. On the issue of investigating the kinetics of processes in dissociated water steam. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017;42:20843–20848.

5. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A. N. Hydrogen production competitive efficiency estimated with the method of water electrolysis on basis off-peak electricity (Otsenka konkurentnoi effektivnosti polucheniya vodoroda metodom elektroliza vody na osnove vnepikovoi elektroenergii). Izvestiya RAN. Energetika, 2016;4:84–90 (in Russ.).

6. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A.N., Garievskii M.V. Assessment of the Performance of a Nuclear–Hydrogen Power Generation System. Thermal Engineering, 2019;66:196–209

7. Bairamov A.N. life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy facility by criterion for maximum load frequency. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019;44:5696–5703.

8. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A.N. Evaluation of Systemic Efficiency of NPP into Combiningwith Energy Complex Using Hydrogen Fuel (Otsenka sistemnoi effektivnosti AES v kombinirovanii s vodorodnym energeticheskim kompleksom). Izvestiya RAN. Energetika, 2019;1:70–81.

9. Aminov R.Z., Bairamov A.N. Participation Efficiency of the NPP with the Hydrogen Production Facility in Primary Frequency Regulation of the Power System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018;1111:012023.

10. Forsberg C.W., Haratyk G. Nuclear Wind hydrogen systems for variable electricity and hydrogen production. International Congress on Energy, New York, 2011. Available on: https://www.aiche.org/academy/videos/conference-presentations/nuclear-wind-hydrogen-systems-variable-electricity-and-hydrogen-production (04.29.2019).

11. Forsberg C.W. Is hydrogen the future of nuclear energy? International topical meeting on the safety and technology of nuclear hydrogen production, control and management, Boston, 2007. Available on: http://www.350.me.uk/TR/Hansen/Forsberg01.pdf (04 29.2019).

12. Forsberg C.W. Hydrogen futures and technologies.Rohsenow Symposium on Future Trends in Heat Transfer, Massachusetts, 2003. Available on: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/7303/FORSBERG.pdf?sequence=1 (04.29.2019).

13. Forsberg C.W. Production of Hydrogen Using Nuclear Energy. International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE), 2004;2(10):5–9.

14. Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier and its Production by Nuclear Power. International Atomic Energy Agency. 1999; 347 p.

15. Sorgulu F., Dincer I. Cost evaluation of two potential nuclear power plants for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018;43:10522–10529.

16. Antony A., Maheshwari N.K., Rama Rao A. generic methodology to evaluate economics of hydrogen production using energy from nuclear power plants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017;42:25813–25823.

17. Ma Z., Lu Y., Chen R., Xiao H., Wang M., Su G.H., Qiu S., Tian W. Study on the hydrogen risk in venturi scrubber filter of filtered containment venting system under PWR severe accident. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018;327:61–69.

18. Verfondern K., Yan X., Nishihara T., Allelein H.-J. Safety concept of nuclear cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017;42:7551–7559.

19. Al-Zareer M., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. Development and assessment of a novel integrated nuclear plant for electricity and hydrogen production. Energy Conversionand Management, 2017;134:221–234.

20. Shpilrain E.E., Sarumov Yu.A., Popel O.S. Application of hydrogen in power engineering and in energy technology complexes (Primenenie vodoroda v energetike i v energotehnologicheskih kompleksah). Atomic-hydrogen power engineering and technology, 1982;4:5–22 (in Russ.).

21. Malyshenko S.P., Nazarova O.V., Sarumov Yu.A. Some thermodynamic, technical and economic aspects of the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier in the energy sector (Nekotorye termodinamicheskie i tehniko-ekonomicheskie aspekty primeneniya vodoroda kak energonositelya v energetike). Atomic-hydrogen power engineering and technology, 1986;7:105–126 (in Russ.).

22. Aminov R.Z, Bairamov A.N. Pat. 2427048 RF, MPK7 F 22B 1/26, G 21D5/16, F 01K3/18. System combustion of hydrogen for steam-hydrogen overheating of fresh steam in the cycle of an atomic power station (Sistema szhiganiya vodoroda dlya paro-vodorodnogo peregreva svezhego para v tsikle atomnoi elektricheskoi stantsii) / 20.08.2011, Bul. no. 23, 8 p. (in Russ.).

23. Aminov R.Z, Bairamov A.N., Egorov A.N. Turbine plant of the nuclear power plant (options) (Turbinnaya ustanovka atomnoi elektrostantsii (varianty)). Pat. № 2459293 RF, MPK7 G 21D1/00. / 20.08.2012, Bul. no. 23, 9 p. (in Russ.).

24. Aminov R.Z., Egorov A.N., Yurin V.E. Hydrogen cycle based backup for NPP internal needs during a blackout. Atomic Energy, 2013;114:289–292.

25. Bairamov A. N. Evaluation of the operating resource of the most loaded rotor element of the additional steam turbine with steam-hydrogen overheat of the working fluid at a nuclear power station. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017;891:012252.

26. Khrustalev V.A.,Garievskii M.V., Lazarev G.B. On the efficiency of variable frequency drives of the main circulating pumps of nuclear power plants with water-cooled (VVER) and fast neutron reactors (BN). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018;1111:012028.

27. Norms of participation of nuclear power units in the normalized primary frequency regulation (Normy uchastiya energoblokov atomnyh elektrostantsii v normirovannom pervichnom regulirovanii chastoty). Appendix 1 to the order of JSC SO UES of 19.08.2013 No. 314. (in Russ.).

28. Regulation of the frequency and overflows of active power in the UES and the isolated energy systems of Russia (Regulirovanie chastoty i peretokov aktivnoi moshchnosti v EJeS i izolirovanno rabotayushchih energosistemah Rossii). The organization standard of the OJSC RAO “UES of Russia” is the operational dispatch management in the electric power industry. Introduction Date: 2007-11-01. (in Russ.).

29. Pavlushko S.A. Technical requirements for generating equipment of wholesale market participants (Tehnicheskie trebovaniya k generiruyushchemu oborudovaniyu uchastnikov optovogo rynka). Moscow, 2017; 192 p. (in Russ.).

30. Report on the functioning of the UES of Russia in 2018 (Otchet o funktsionirovanii EJeS Rossii v 2018 godu). Available on: https://soups.ru/fileadmin/files/company/reports/disclosure/2019/ups_rep2018.pdf. (29.04.2019).

31. Zhiritskii G.S., Strunkin V.A. Design and strength calculation parts of steam and gas turbines (Konstruktsiya i raschet na prochnost' detalei parovyh i gazovyh turbin) 3rd edition. Moscow: Mashinostroenie Publ., 1968; 523 p. (in Russ.).

32. Kostiuk A.G. Dynamics and strength of turbomachines (Dinamika i prochnost' turbomashin) 3rd edition. Moscow: Publishing house MEI, 2007; 476 p. (in Russ.).

33. Aminov R.Z., Bayramov A.N., Egorov A.N. Investigate the working life of an additional steam turbine of nuclear power plants as part of the hydrogen energy complex under thermal cycling conditions (Issledovat' rabochii resurs dopolnitel'noi parovoi turbiny AJeS v sostave vodorodnogo energeticheskogo kompleksa v usloviyah termotsiklicheskih nagruzok). Research report, Department of Energy Problems of the Saratov Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saratov, 2016; 88 p. (in Russ.).

34. Bairamov A.N. System analysis of the stress-cycle mode of operation of the main equipment of the hydrogen energy complex in combination with nuclear power plants (Sistemnyi analiz napryazhenno-tsiklicheskogo rezhima raboty osnovnogo oborudovaniya vodorodnogo energeticheskogo kompleksa v kombinirovanii s AES). Trudy Aka-demenergo, 2017;1:71–96 (in Russ.).

35. Mechanics of Destruction and Strength of Materials (Mekhanika razrusheniya i prochnost' materialov: spravochnoe posobie) / Ed. V.V. Panasyuk, Kiev: Nauk. dumka Publ.,1990;4:680 (in Russ.).

36. Machine-Building: Encyclopedia on Machine-Building (Mashinostroenie: entsiklopediya po mashino-stroeniyu) / Editorial Board: K.V. Frolov [et al.]. Moscow: Mashinostroenie Publ., 2010;II-1:852 (in Russ.).

37. Kogaev V.P., Makhutov N. A., Gusenkov A.P. The Calculations Detail of Machines and Constructions on Strength and Long-Lived (Raschety detalei mashin i konstruktsii na prochnost' i dolgovechnost'). Moscow: Mashinostroenie Publ., 1985; 223 p. (in Russ.).

38. Pavlov P.A. The Foundations of Engineering’s Calculations of Elements Machines on Fatigue and Long-Lived Strength (Osnovy inzhenernyh raschetov elementov mashin na ustalost' i dlitel'nuyu prochnost'). Leningrad, 1988; 252 p. (in Russ.).

39. Troshchenko V.T., Pokrovskii V.V., Prokopenko A.V. The Stability of Metals Crack in Cycles Loads (Treshchinostoikost' metallov pri tsiklicheskom nagruzhenii), Kiev: Naukova dumka Publ., 1987 (in Russ.).

40. Cherepanov G.P. The Mechanics of Frail Destructions (Mehanika hrupkogo razrusheniya) Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1974; 640 p. (in Russ.).

41. Aminov R.Z., Bayramov A.N., Egorov A.N. Assessing the effect of cyclic loads on the technical and economic indicators of the hydrogen energy complex equipment (Otsenka vliyaniya tsiklicheskih nagruzok na tehniko-ekonomicheskie pokazateli oborudovaniya vodorodnogo energeticheskogo kompleksa). Research report, Department of Energy Problems of the Saratov Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saratov, 2018; 81 p. (in Russ.).

42. Prokopenko A.V. [et al.] The connection between the diagram of fatigue fracture and the fatigue curve (Svyaz' mezhdu diagrammoi ustalostnogo razrusheniya i krivoi ustalosti). Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriia Protsessy i apparaty pishchevykh proizvodstv, 2012;1:48 (in Russ.).