Lockdown effects on air pollution with meteorological conditions in Istanbul

Pandemic, Air Pollution, Istanbul, COVID-19, Lockdown

1. World Health Organization. (2020). Q&As on COVID-19 and related health topics. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub

2. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health. (2020). COVID-19 Posters and Leaflets. Retrieved from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/en/covid-19-i-ngilizcedokumanlar/covid-19-i-ngilizce-afis-ve-brosurler.html

3. Berman, J. D. & Ebisu, K. (2020). Changes in U.S. air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science of the Total Environment, 739, 139864. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139864

4. Venter, Z. S., Aunan, K., Chowdhury, S., & Lelieveld, J. (2020). COVID-19 lockdowns cause global air pollution declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 18984-18990. doi:10.1073/pnas.2006853117

5. Zhu, Y., Xie, J., Huang, F. & Cao, L. (2020). Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138704

6. Kim, K. H., Lee, S. B., Woo, D., & Bae, G. N. (2015). Influence of wind direction and speed on the transport of particle-bound PAHs in a roadway environment. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 6(6), 1024-1034.

7. Wang, J., Ogawa, S. (2015). Effects of meteorological conditions on PM2. 5 concentrations in Nagasaki, Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(8), 9089-9101.

8. Unal, Y. S., Toros, H., Deniz, A., & Incecik, S. (2011). Influence of meteorological factors and emission sources on spatial and temporal variations of PM10 concentrations in Istanbul metropolitan area. Atmospheric Environment, 45(31), 5504–5513. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.039

9. Kara, Y., Kahya, C., Öztopal, A. (2019). Marmara Bölgesi İçin Uydu Verileri Kullanılarak PM10 Tespiti, Conference Paper: IV. Meteorolojik Uzaktan Algılama Sempozyumu 11-15 Kasım, Antalya. Retrieved from: http://uzalmet.mgm.gov.tr/tammetin/2019/16.pdf [Access Date 26.08.2020]

10. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Retrieved from: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ilgosterge/?locale=tr [Access Date 26.08.2020]

11. Gürel, A., Gündüz A. (2011). İstanbul’un Ekolojik Yapısı Üzerine Bir Araştırma. The Journal of Marmara Social Research, 1(6). Retrieved from: http://www.marmarasosyaldergi.org/makale/6.pdf [Access Date 26.08.2020]

12. WEB-2: TC. İstanbul Valiliği. Retrieved from: http://www.istanbul.gov.tr/asya-ve-avrupayi-birlestirensehir-istanbul [Access Date 26.08.2020]

13. National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce (2015), NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids, https://doi.org/10.5065/D65Q4T4Z , Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colo. (Updated daily.)

14. Thompson, Gregory, Paul R. Field, Roy M. Rasmussen, William D. Hall, 2008: Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5095–5115. doi:10.1175/2008MWR2387.1

15. Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large–scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779–1800. doi:10.1175/15200493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2

16. Zhang, Chunxi, Yuqing Wang, and Kevin Hamilton, 2011: Improved representation of boundary layer clouds over the southeast pacific in ARW–WRF using a modified Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3489–3513. doi:10.1175/MWR-D10-05091.1

17. Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long–lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103. doi:10.1029/2008JD009944

18. Janjic, Z. I., 1994: The Step–Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927–945. doi:10.1175/1520-

19. Janjic, Z. I., 2002: Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note No. 437, 61 pp.

20. Tewari, M., F. Chen, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, M. A. LeMone, K. Mitchell, M. Ek, G. Gayno, J. Wegiel, and R. H. Cuenca, 2004: Implementation and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in the WRF model. 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/16th conference on numerical weather prediction, pp. 11–15.