

A PROPOSAL OF AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE FOR THE REDUCTION OF IRON ORE IN THE EASTERN AMAZONIA
https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2019.01-03.076-079
Abstract
Brazil has decreased the utilization of wood under the form of either charcoal or fuel wood to about 10% of its energy consumption (year 2000). The same is not true for the Brazilian Amazonia where there is a growing demand of charcoal for the production of pig iron in the Greater Carajas Program. The objective of the present study is to verify the feasibility of using electrolytic hydrogen instead of charcoal for the direct reduction of iron ore in that region. Techno, economic and environmental aspects are considered. This study can be benefcial to Brazil in general and Amazonia in particular since natural resources might be preserved and pollution avoided.
About the Authors
L. C. de LimaUnited States
Fortaleza, CE 60811-905, USA
tel.: +1-55-85-477-3083; fax: +1-55-85-477-3061
J. B. Furlan Duarte
United States
Fortaleza, CE 60811-905, USA
tel.: +1-55-85-477-3083; fax: +1-55-85-477-3061
T. N. Veziroglu
United States
Ph.D. in Heat Transfer, Professor, President of International Association for Hydrogen Energy, a member of 18 scientific organizations.
Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA
References
1. [1] Abracave—Brazilian Association of Charcoal. Statistical yearbook, 2001.
2. [2] De Lima L.C. Readiness of Brazil to be the 8rst country to utilize hydrogen as energy carrier: the Amazon issue. Report to the Clean Energy Research Institute, University of Miami, USA, 1991. 64p.
3. [3] De Lima L.C., Barbir F., Veziroglu T.N. Electrolytic hydrogen produced steel instead of charcoal produced steel in the Brazilian Amazonia. Ninth World Hydrogen Energy Conference, vol. 3. Paris, France, 22–25 June, 1992. p. 1837–44.
4. [4] De Lima L.C., Barretos J.C.N. Hydrogen utilization for the reduction of iron ore in the Brazilian Amazonia: prospective natural resources preservation. Fourth International Conference on New Energy Systems and Conversions, Osaka, Japan, 27–30 June, 1999.
5. [5] World Bank Group, Pollution prevention and abatement handbook: iron and steel manufacturing, draft technical background document. Environment Department, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. p. 328.
6. [6] Feinman J. Direct reduction and smelting process. The AISE Steel Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1999. p. 763–6 [chapter 11].
7. [7] Zervas T., McMullan J.T., Willians B.C. Developments in iron and steel making. Int. J. Energy Res., 1996;20:69–91.
8. [8] Tarnay D.S. Hydrogen production at hydro power plants. Hydrogen energy progress, V, vol. I. Toronto, Canada: Pergamon Press, 1984. p. 323–33.
9. [9] Davis C.G., McFarling J.F., Pratt H.R. Direct reduction technology and economics. Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1982;9(3):93–129.
Review
For citations:
de Lima L.C., Furlan Duarte J.B., Veziroglu T.N. A PROPOSAL OF AN ALTERNATIVE ROUTE FOR THE REDUCTION OF IRON ORE IN THE EASTERN AMAZONIA. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2019;(01-03):76-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2019.01-03.076-079