Buy (120 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Improvement of Biohydrogen Production with Novel Augmentation Strategy Using Different Organic Residues
https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2019.34-36.026-040
Abstract
Biohydrogen has been regarded as carbon neutral fuel. Thus it possesses tremendous potential in energy sector. The present study deals with the potentiality of bio-augmented facultative anaerobic bacteria with obligate anaerobe for the improvement of H2 production. The co-culture strategy of Klebsellia pneumoniae and Clostridium acetobutylicum improved hydrogen yield by 37% and 18% respectively as compared to individual organism. COD removal efficiency was also observed higher in case of co-culture. Maximum H2 yield by this augmented system using cane molasses, starchy wastewater and distillery effluent were 9.47, 8.72 and 7.78 mol H2 kg-1 COD reduced respectively. The COD removal efficiency using different organic residues were in the range of 50–70%. Highest H2 production rate of 1125, 642 and 790 mL L-1 h-1 were observed by using cane molasses, starchy wastewater and distillery effluent respectively in CSTR. So, bio-augmented system could be helpful in realizing the goal of “waste to energy” concept.
About the Authors
P. Sinha
Indian Institute of Technology
India
India
Kharagpur 721302
K. Gaurav
Indian Institute of Technology
India
India
Kharagpur 721302
S. Roy
Indian Institute of Technology
India
India
Kharagpur 721302
G. Balachandar
Indian Institute of Technology
India
India
Kharagpur 721302
D. Das
Indian Institute of Technology
India
India
Debabrata Das, Ph.D. in Bioenergy, Professor, member of 8 scientific organizations Department of Biotechnology
Kharagpur 721302
References
1. Forsberg C.W. Future hydrogen markets for large-scale hydrogen production systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2007;32:431–9.
2. Abánades A. The challenge of hydrogen production for the transition to a CO2-free economy, 2012:11–16.
3. Maeda T., Sanchez-Torres V., Wood T.K. Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 is a reversible enzyme possessing hydrogen uptake and synthesis activities. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol 2007;76:1035–42.
4. Peters J.W., Schut G.J., Boyd E.S., Mulder D.W., Shepard E.M., Broderick J.B., et al. [FeFe]and [NiFe]hydrogenase diversity, mechanism, and maturation. BiochimBiophysActa Mol Cell Res., 2015;1853:1350–69.
5. Vignais P.M., Colbeau A. Molecular biology of microbial hydrogenases. Curr Issues Mol Biol., 2004;6:159–88.
6. Roy S., Ghosh S., Das D. Improvement of hydrogen production with thermophilic mixed culture from rice spent wash of distillery industry. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012;37:15867–74.
7. Kumar N., Das D. Enhancement of hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08. Process Biochem., 2000;35:589–93.
8. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington D.C.: APHA-AWWAWEF, 1998.
9. Shiraishi T., Fukusaki E., Kajiyama S. Kobayashi a. Short communication A simple assay for formate dehydrogenase activity by gas chromatography e mass spectrometry q. J Chromatogr A, 1999;855:337–40.
10. Dutta T., Das A.K., Das D. Purification and characterization of [Fe]-hydrogenase from high yielding hydrogen-producing strain, Enterobacter cloacae IITBT08 (MTCC 5373). Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009;34:7530–7.
11. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem., 1959;31:426–8.
12. Elasharnouby O., Hafez H., Nakhla G., Naggar M.H.E. A critical literature review on biohydrogen production by pure cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013;38:4945–66.
13. Das D., Khanna N., Dasgupta C.N. Biohydrogen production. 1sted. New York: CRC press Taylor & Francis; 2014.
14. Pandey A., Sinha P. An evaluative report and challenges for fermentative biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2011;36:7460–78.
15. Park M.J., Jo J.H., Park D., Lee D.S., Park J.M. Comprehensive study on a two-stage anaerobic digestion process for the sequential production of hydrogen and methane from cost-effective molasses. Renew Energy, 2010;35:6194–202.
16. Arimi M.M., Knodel J., Kiprop A., Namango S.S., Zhang Y., Geißen S.-U. Strategies for improvement of biohydrogen production from organic-rich wastewater: a review. Biomass Bioenergy, 2015;75:101–18.
17. Roy S., Vishnuvardhan M., Das D. Continuous thermophilic biohydrogen production in packed bed reactor. Appl Energy, 2014;136:51–8.
18. Ngoma L., Masilela P., Obazu F., Gray V.M. The effect of temperature and effluent recycle rate on hydrogen production by undefined bacterial granules. Bioresour Technol, 2011;102:8986–91.
19. Lu W., Wen J., Chen Y., Sun B., Jia X., Liu M., et al. Synergistic effect of Candida maltosa HY-35 and Enterobacter aerogenes W-23 on hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2007;32:1059–66.
20. Yokoi H., Tokushige T., Hirose J., Hayashi S., Takasaki Y. H2 production from starch by a mixed culture of Clostridium butyricum and Enterobacter aerogenes. BiotechnolLett., n.d.;20:143–147.
21. Pachapur V.L., Sarma S.J., Brar S.K., Le Bihan Y., Buelna G., Verma M. Biohydrogen production by cofermentation of crude glycerol and apple pomacehydrolysate using coculture of Enterobacter aerogenes and Clostridium butyricum. BioresourTechnol, 2015;193:297–306.
22. Cheng J., Zhu M. A novel anaerobic co-culture system for biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse. BioresourTechnol, 2013;144:623–31.
23. Seppälä J.J., Puhakka J.A., Yli-Harja O., Karp M.T., Santala V. Fermentative hydrogen production by Clostridium butyricum and Escherichia coli in pure and cocultures. Int J HydrogenEnergy, 2011;36:10701–8.
Review
For citations:
Sinha P., Gaurav K., Roy S., Balachandar G., Das D. Improvement of Biohydrogen Production with Novel Augmentation Strategy Using Different Organic Residues. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2019;(34-36):26-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2019.34-36.026-040
Views:
568
Email this article 