

Protection against formation of methanohydrates during gas production
https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2023.06.174-185
Abstract
It is shown that one of the topical and difficult moments, both in technological and environmental terms, in oil and gas condensate fields, especially in the northern territories, is the fight against hydrate formation. Gas hydrates occur under thermobaric conditions and are the main cause of serious disturbances in the wellbore and pipelines, which reduces the efficiency of energy production. It was revealed that in order to intensify oil and gas production, an inhibitor, toxic methanol, is traditionally used. The mechanism of inhibition of hydrate formation by methanol was studied, and the negative environmental consequences were analyzed. A search was made and a critical analysis was made of modern reagents, as an alternative to methanol, to suppress gas hydrate plugs. A comparative calculation of economic indicators for three variants of inhibitors was carried out: thermal - methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG), kinetic - SONGID1801-A. t has been shown that a great advantage of kinetic inhibitors is their low dosage, which is a multiple lower than methanol dosages, and environmental safety. Their use will significantly increase the productivity of the well and reduce the environmental risks of the northern territories in the oil and gas production zone.
About the Author
G. I. SarapulovaRussian Federation
Sarapulova Galina Ibragimovna - Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor, Russia, Full member of the International Academy of Sciences of Ecology, Human Safety and Nature (MANEB); full member of the European Academy of Natural Sciences
83 Lermontov str., Irkutsk, 664074
References
1. R. V. Galiulin, R. A. Galiulina. Risk za-gryazneniya okruzhayushchei sredy metanolom v gazovoi promyshlennosti. Problemy analiza riska. 2018.T 15. № 4. Str. 54-59.
2. U.T. Gairabekov. Geoehkologicheskie aspekty osvoeniya neftegazovykh mestorozhdenii v gornykh i predgornykh raionakh (na primere Chechenskoi. res-publiki). Ustoichivoe razvitie gornykh territorii. 2016.T 8. № 2. Str. 312-322 DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2016-8-2-127-134.
3. Xiao-Sen Li, Bo Yang, Yu Zhang, Gang Li, LiPing Duan, Yi Wang, Zhao-Yang Chen, Ning-Sheng Huang, Hui-Jie Wu Experimental Investigation into Gas Production from Methane Hydrate in Sediment by Depressurization in a Novel Pilot-Scale Hydrate Simulator. Applied Energy. 2012. Vol. 93. P. 722-732. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.009.
4. Chen L. Production Strategy for Oceanic Methane Hydrate Extraction and Power Generation with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS).Energy. 2017. Vol. 126. P. 256-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.029.
5. V. E. Pudakova, V.G. Afanasenko, A.V Rubtsov. Gidratoobrazovanie v neftegazovoi otrasli i metody bor'by s nimi. Izvestiya TuLGU.Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2021.vyp 11. Str 306-311. DOI: 10.2441/2071-6168-2021-11-306-311.
6. Okmyanskaya V. M. Aktual'nye voprosy lokal'nogo ehkologicheskogo monitoringa promyshlen-noi ploshchadki na primere neftegazodobyvayushchego regiona. International agricultural journal.6/2022. DOI 10.55186/25876740_2022_6_6_27.
7. R. V., Galiulin, V. N Bashkin., R. A., Gali-ulina. Problema bezopasnogo primeneniya metanola v gazovoi promyshlennosti: ehkspertiza i innova-tsii/R.V. Galiulin, V.N. Bashkin, R.A. Galiulina. Innovatika i ehkspertiza: nauchnye trudy. 2017. 2 (20) .S. 101-110.
8. A.A. Grunval'd. Rost potrebleniya metanola v gazovoi promyshlennosti i geoehkologicheskie ris-ki, voznikayushchie pri ego ispol'zovanii v kachestve ingibitora gidratoobrazovaniya. Neftegazovoe de-lo. 2007 http://www.ogbus.ru.
9. D. V. Sergeeva, S.G. Kudeyarov. Otlozhenie gazovykh gidratov ili l'da v promyslovykh trubo-provodakh sistem sbora gaza Senomanskoi zalezhi Yamburskogo mestorozhdeniya. ZH. Transport i khrane-nie nefteproduktov i uglevodorodnogo syr'ya. https://doi.org/10.2441/01031-4270-2018-1056/.
10. S.V. Kitaev, YU.V. Kolotilov, A.YU. Plot-nikov, A.A.,Kovalev, SH.K.Sheikhgasanov. Issledova-niya ingibitorov gidratoobrazovaniya v protsesse dobychi i transportirovki uglevodorodov v mor-skikh usloviyakh. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring gerresursov. 2021. T 322. №2. Str. 190-199. DOI 10.18799/24131830/2021/02/3055.
11. A. YU. Zhukov. Metody «zelenoI» khimii: novye ehkologichnye resheniya v oblasti neftepromyslovykh reagentov. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2010. №8. S.138-139.
12. A. D. Khovanskii, I.V., Bogachev, E.M. Bayan. Kompleksnaya otsenka ehkologicheskoi opasnosti predpriyatii i territorii. Ehkologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2016. T. 20. № 10. Str. 58-63. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2016-10-58-63.
13. M.G. Makarova, N.S. Uzdieva Opyt otsenki krizisnoi ehkologicheskoi situatsii v neftedobyva-yushchem raione. Vest. Rossiiskogo universiteta Druzhby narodov. 2001. Vyp. 2. Str. 397-400.
14. N. P. Zapivalov Geologicheskie i ehkologicheskie riski v razvedke i dobyche nefti. Georesursy. 2013. № 3 (53). S. 3–4.
15. A. D. Khovanskii, E.M. Bayan, I.V. Bogachev. Upravlenie promyshlennoi i ehkologicheskoi bez-opasnost'yu. Ehkologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2017;21(7):52-57. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2017-7-52-57.
16. A. M. Shchipachev, A.S. Dmitrieva. Primenenie ehffekta rezonansnogo ehnergorazdeleniya v punktakh redutsirovaniya prirodnogo gaza s tsel'yupovysheniya ehnergoehffektivnosti sistem gazoraspredeleniya. Zapiski gornogo instituta 2021. T 248. Str 253-259. https://DOI.Org/10.31897/pmi.2021.2.9..
17. A. V. Faresov, A.V.Sharapov, A.I. Ponoma-rev. Issledovanie ehffektivnosti ingibitorov gid-ratoobrazovanyai kineticheskogo tipa. Neftegazovoe delo. 2013. T11. №4. Str. 86-95.
18. V. V. Koledin. O vozmozhnosti detonatsii metanovozdushnoi smesi, soderzhashchei chastitsy gid-rata. Setevoe izdanie «Neftegazovoe delO». 2023. № 1. Str. 178–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.17122/ogbus2023-1-178-192.
19. S.Y. Misyura. Non-Stationary Combustion of Natural and Artificial Methane Hydrate at Heterogeneous Dissociation. Energy. 2019. Vol. 181. P. 589-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.177. 191.
20. T. Bar-Kohany, W.A. Sirignano. Transient Combustion of a Methane-Hydrate Sphere. Combustion and Flame. 2016. Vol. 163. P. 284-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.10.004.
21. A. P. Semenov, L. A. Magadova, M. A. Silin, S. A. Malyutin, A. S. Stoporev, P. A. Gushchin, E. V. Ivanov, R. I., Mendgaziev, V. A. Vinokurov. Kineticheskii ingibitor gidratoobrazovaniya. Pat. 2677494 Rossiiskaya Federatsiya, zayavitel' i paten-toobladatel'FGAOU VO "Rossiiskii universitet nefti i gaza (natsional'nyi issledovatel'skii uni-versitet) imeni I.M. Gubkina"; zayavl. 04.12.2017; opubl.7.01.2019 Byul. № 2.
22. M. Mirnyi. Metanol 2016. Itogi otrasle-voi konferentsii. Informatsionno-analiticheskii portal MPlast.by. Polimery dlya vsekh. Ehlektronnyi resurs rezhim dostupa: https://mplast.by/novosti/2016-07-06-metanol-2016-itogi-otraslevoy-konferentsii.
23. A. V. Faresov. Sravnenie ehffektivnosti in-gibitorov gidratoobrazovaniya kineticheskogo tipa i opyt ikh promyshlennogo primeneniya v PAO «Orenburg Neft'». Nauchno-tekhnicheski sbornik ve-sti gazovoi nauki. 2016. 2(26). Str. 117-122.
24. Kompozitsiya i sposob umen'sheniya aglomeratsii gidratov. RU2562974C22015-09-10.
25. Sopolimery na osnove akrilamida, terpo-limery i primenenie v kachestve ingibitorov gidra-toobrazovaniya. CN109196007B2021-07-20.
26. Kompozitsii, soderzhashchie amidnye poverkhnostno-aktivnye veshchestva, i sposoby ingibirova-niya obrazovaniya gidratnykh aglomeratov. CA2754016C2015-09-15.
27. Kationnye ammoniinye poverkhnostno-aktivnye veshchestva v kachestve nizkodozirovannykh ingibitorov gidratoobrazovaniya. US9765254B22017-09-19.
28. Copolimer akriloila, terpolimera i ingi-bitora gidratov. JP6878463B22021-05-26.
29. Pat.2481 375 RU, MPK S09K 8/524. Ingibi-tor gidratoobrazovaniya kineticheskogo deistviya. V. A. Volkov, V. D. Balashov I. A.,Chernyshev. № 2011150053/03. zayavlen 08.12.2011. opubl. 10.05. 2013.byull. №13. GAZPROM PJSC. no. 2011150053/03; RU 2481375, Int. Cl. am 8/524.
30. V. D. Balashova, I. A. Chernyshev, O. YU. Konoval'chuk. Promyslovye ispytaniya ehkologicheski bezopasnogo maloraskhodnogo ingibitora obrazova-niya gazovykh gidratov kineticheskogo deistviya. Nauchnotekhnicheskii sbornik vesti gazovoi nauki. 2018. № 1 (33). Str. 243-247.
31. F. G. Ishmuratov, N. T. Rakhimova, EH. R. Ishmiyarov, A. I. Voloshin, V. N. Gusakov, YU. V.Tomilov, N. EH. Nifant'ev, V. A. Dokichev. Novyi «zelenyI» polisakharidnyi ingibitor gazogidratoobrazova-niya na osnove natrievoi soli karboksimetiltsellyu-lozy. ZHPKH. 2018. T 91. No 4. S. 584-587.
32. A. V. Faresov, A.I. Ponomarev. Izuchenie tekhnologicheskikh kharakteristik ingibitorov gidratoobrazovaniya kineticheskogo tipa pri primenenii i utilizatsii na ob"ektakh neftegazodobychi. Ehlek-tronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal «Neftegazovoe delO». 2014. №1. Str. 137 – 147.
Review
For citations:
Sarapulova G.I. Protection against formation of methanohydrates during gas production. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2023;(6):174-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2023.06.174-185