Buy (120 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Technological and institutional priorities of the oil and gas industry complex of the Russian Federation in the context of the global energy transition
https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2023.09.062-077
Abstract
The article examines the issue of modern challenges in the development of the fuel and energy complex, including the oil and gas industry as its basis in terms of the volume of tax revenues to the budget. Industry technological priorities have been identified: the creation of domestic equipment and technologies for the traditional fuel and energy complex in the upstream sector, digital transformation and the development of Industry 4.0 technologies, the development of technological competencies in key areas of the energy transition, and the development of technologies in terms of ecology and industrial safety. The world experience of supporting the development of scientific research in industry is analyzed using the examples of the USA, Norway and China. An analysis of the challenges of institutional development of the fuel and energy complex at all stages from research to serial production is presented. State covenants have been determined in the field of human resources development to implement the energy transition of the domestic fuel and energy complex, independent of external circumstances. Based on the analysis of internal barriers and successful international practices, proposals were made for the development of state technology policy.
About the Authors
O. V. Zhdaneev
Competence Center for Technological Development of the Fuel and Energy Complex under the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation/Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis named after. A.V. Topchiev Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCS RAS); Yugra State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg Valerievich Zhdaneev, leading Researcher, Professor, Advisor to the Gen-
eral Director/Head Federal State Budgetary Institution, Doctor of Technical Sci-
ences
Education: Lomonosov Moscow State University, Tomsk Polytechnic University. Scientific interests area: hydrogen energy, technological development of the fuel and energy complex, petroleomics, energy. Publications: 169
Higher Oil School
119991; Leninsky Prospekt, 29; Moscow; Chekhov str., 16; KhantyMansiysk
K. N. Frolov
Competence Center for Technological Development of the Fuel and Energy Complex under the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konstantin Nikolaevich Frolov, Project manager
Education: Samara State Technical University. Research area: oil and gas exploration & production, LNG, technological development of the fuel and energy complex, energy, permafrost. Publications: 17
Moscow
References
1. Bouckaert S, Pales AF, McGlade C, Remme U, Wanner B, Varro L, et al. Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector 2021. IEA:Paris; 2021 https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
2. Li Y, Shi X, Phoumin H. A strategic roadmap for large-scale green hydrogen demonstration and commercialisation in China : A review and survey analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:24592–609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.077.
3. Bravkov PV, Durdyeva AA, Zhdaneev OV, Zuev SS, Korenev VV, Frolov KN, Chuboksarov VS. Issues of technical policy of the fuel and energy sectors of the Russian Federation. Moscow:Nauka; 2020. doi: 10.7868/9785020408241.
4. BP Energy Outlook 2050, https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2023.pdf/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].
5. OPEC World Oil Outlook 2022, https://woo.opec.org/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].
6. IEA World Energy Investment 2022, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2022/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].
7. Zhdaneev OV. Technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation fuel and energy complex. PMI 2022;258:1061–78. doi: 10.31897/PMI.2022.107.
8. Zhdaneev O, Zuev S. Challenges for the Russian energy sector until 2035. Energy Policy 2020:12–23. doi: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_3145_12.
9. Melnikov VP, Osipov VI, Brouchkov AV, Badi-na SV, Sadurtdinov MR, Drozdov DS, et al. Past and future of permafrost monitoring: Stability of Russian energetic infrastructure. Energies 2022;15:3190. doi: 10.3390/en15093190.
10. Fatma A. Overview of the Japanese innovation systems vs. The American innovation system. J Glob Econ 2018;06. doi: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000312.
11. Brás GR. Pillars of the Global Innovation Index by income level of economies: longitudinal data (2011-2022) for researchers’ use. Data Brief 2023;46:108818. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108818.
12. Popp D, Pless J, Haščič I, Johnstone N. 4. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector. The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, University of Chicago Press; 2022, p. 175–248. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226810645-006.
13. Pal A, Kakran S, Kumar A, Youssef AB, Singh UP, Sidhu A. Powering squarely into the future: A strate-gic analysis of hydrogen energy in QUAD nations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.169.
14. Ali W, Birdwell JE, Bowker K, Burke B, Flaum JA, Hammes U, et al. Energy and minerals division tight oil and gas committee activities and commodity report for 2020-2021. Unpublished; 2022. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27628.85125.
15. Vora S, Williams M. (Invited) The SOFC Program at the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) and National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). ECS Trans 2023;111:9. doi: 10.1149/11106.0009ecst.
16. Chien F, Ananzeh M, Mirza F, Bakar A, Vu HM, Ngo TQ. The effects of green growth, environmental-related tax, and eco-innovation towards carbon neutrality target in the US economy. J Environ Manage 2021;299:113633. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113633.
17. Kryukov VA. On the interconnection and interaction of economic, industrial and scientific-technological policies. Science management: theory and practice 2020;2:15–46. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.1.
18. Thune T, Engen OA, Wicken O. Petroleum Industry Transformations: Lessons from Norway and Beyond. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge; 2019. doi: 10.4324/9781315142456.
19. Høyland SA, Kjestveit K, Østgaard Skotnes R. Exploring the complexity of hydrogen perception and acceptance among key stakeholders in Norway. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:7896–908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.144.
20. Espegren K, Damman S, Pisciella P, Graabak I, Tomasgard A. The role of hydrogen in the transition from a petroleum economy to a low-carbon society. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:23125–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.143.
21. Fu X, McKern B, Chen J. The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation. Oxford University Press; 2021.https://books.google.ru/books/about/The_Oxford_Handbook_of_China_Innovation.html?hl=&id=WxtJEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y [accessed 27 July 2023].
22. Wu K, Wang X. Studying financial aspect of green credit and regional heterogeneity on technology innovation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28846-6.
23. Ma Q, Murshed M, Khan Z. The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy 2021;155:112345. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112345.
24. Liu L-J, Liu L-C, Liang Q-M. Restructuring investment to promote a win–win situation for both the economy and the environment in China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2023;182:113363. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113363.
25. Mohamued EA, Ahmed M, Pypłacz P, Liczmańska-Kopcewicz K, Khan MA. Global Oil Price and Innovation for Sustainability: The Impact of R&D Spending, Oil Price and Oil Price Volatility on GHG Emissions. Energies 2021;14:1757. doi: 10.3390/en14061757.
26. Filippov SP, Zhdaneev OV. Opportunities for the Application of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies in Case of Global Economy Decarbonization (Review). Therm Eng 2022;69:637–52. doi: 10.1134/S0040601522090014.
27. Zhang K, Jin Z, Li G, Liu Q, Tian L. Gas adsorp-tions of geological carbon storage with enhanced gas recovery. Sep Purif Technol 2023;311:123260. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123260.
28. Wang L, Zhang Y, Zou R, Zou R, Huang L, Liu Y, et al. A systematic review of CO<sub>2</sub> injection for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage in shale reservoirs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.099.
29. Groenendijk DJ, Bouts S, van Wunnik JNM. Performance improvement of chemical enhanced oil recovery by divalent ion–complexing agents. J Pet Sci Eng 2022;215:110609. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110609.
30. Zhdaneev OV, Frolov KN. Drilling technology priorities in Russia (Russian). Oil Industry Journal 2020;2020:42–8. doi: 10.24887/0028-2448-2020-5-42-48.
31. van Oort E, Chen D, Ashok P, Fallah A. Constructing deep closed-loop geothermal wells for globally scalable energy production by leveraging oil and gas ERD and HPHT well construction expertise. Day 2 Tue, March 09, 2021, SPE; 2021. doi: 10.2118/204097-ms.
32. Tatur O, Petrakov Y, Sobolev A. Metrology and standardization in geomechanical modeling - A quantitative assessment of uncertainty window based on calibration data. Day 2 Wed, October 13, 2021, SPE; 2021. doi: 10.2118/206564-ms.
33. Wanasinghe TR, Wroblewski L, Petersen BK, Gosine RG, James LA, De Silva O, et al. Digital Twin for the Oil and Gas Industry: Overview, Research Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges. IEEE Access 2020;8:104175–97. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998723.
34. Meribout M, Azzi A, Ghendour N, Kharoua N, Khezzar L, AlHosani E. Multiphase Flow Meters Targeting Oil & Gas Industries. Measurement 2020;165:108111. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108111.
35. Pan B, Yin X, Zhu W, Yang Y, Ju Y, Yuan Y, et al. Theoretical study of brine secondary imbibition in sandstone reservoirs: Implications for H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO<sub>2т</sub> geo-storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:18058–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.275.
36. Kojima H, Nagasawa K, Todoroki N, Ito Y, Matsui T, Nakajima R. Influence of renewable energy power fluctuations on water electrolysis for green hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:4572–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.018.
37. Benkraiem R, Dubocage E, Lelong Y, Shuwaikh F. The effects of environmental performance and green innovation on corporate venture capital. Ecol Econ 2023;210:107860. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107860.
38. Dalla Fontana S, Nanda R. Innovating to Net Zero: Can Venture Capital and Start-Ups Play a Meaningful Role? Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy 2023;2:79–105. doi: 10.1086/723236.
39. Zhdaneev OV., Seregina AA. Staffing of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation in the conditions of energy transition. Moscow:Infra-M;2022. doi: 10.12737/1865411.
40. Bazhenov S, Dobrovolsky Y, Maximov A, Zhdaneev OV. Key challenges for the development of the hydrogen industry in the Russian Federation. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2022;54:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102867.
Review
For citations:
Zhdaneev O.V., Frolov K.N. Technological and institutional priorities of the oil and gas industry complex of the Russian Federation in the context of the global energy transition. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2023;(9):62-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2023.09.062-077
Views:
64
Email this article 