Технологические и институциональные приоритеты нефтегазового комплекса Российской Федерации в разрезе мирового энергоперехода

   В статье рассматривается вопрос современных вызовов развития топливно-энергетического комплекса, в том числе нефтегазовой отрасли как его основы, по объёмам поступления налогов в бюджет. Определены отраслевые технологические приоритеты: создание отечественной техники и технологий для традиционного ТЭК в сфере upstream, цифровая трансформация и развитие технологий Индустрии 4.0, развитие технологических компетенций по ключевым направлениям энергоперехода, и развитие технологий в части экологии и промышленной безопасности. Проанализирован мировой опыт поддержки развития научно-исследовательских работ в промышленности на примере США, Норвегии и Китая. Представлен анализ вызовов институционального развития ТЭК на всех этапах от НИР до серийного производства. Определены ковенанты государства в сфере развития кадрового потенциала для осуществления независимого от внешних обстоятельств энергоперехода отечественного ТЭК. Исходя из анализа внутренних барьеров и успешных международных практик высказаны предложения по развитию государственной технологической политики.

1. Bouckaert S, Pales AF, McGlade C, Remme U, Wanner B, Varro L, et al. Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector 2021. IEA:Paris; 2021 https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.

2. Li Y, Shi X, Phoumin H. A strategic roadmap for large-scale green hydrogen demonstration and commercialisation in China : A review and survey analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:24592–609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.077.

3. Bravkov PV, Durdyeva AA, Zhdaneev OV, Zuev SS, Korenev VV, Frolov KN, Chuboksarov VS. Issues of technical policy of the fuel and energy sectors of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Nauka; 2020. doi: 10.7868/9785020408241.

4. BP Energy Outlook 2050, https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2023.pdf/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].

5. OPEC World Oil Outlook 2022, https://woo.opec.org/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].

6. IEA World Energy Investment 2022, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2022/; 2023 [accessed 27 July 2023].

7. Zhdaneev OV. Technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation fuel and energy complex. PMI 2022;258:1061–78. doi: 10.31897/PMI.2022.107.

8. Zhdaneev O, Zuev S. Challenges for the Russian energy sector until 2035. Energy Policy 2020:12–23. doi: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_3145_12.

9. Melnikov VP, Osipov VI, Brouchkov AV, Badina SV, Sadurtdinov MR, Drozdov DS, et al. Past and future of permafrost monitoring: Stability of Russian energetic infrastructure. Energies 2022;15:3190. doi: 10.3390/en15093190.

10. Fatma A. Overview of the Japanese innovation systems vs. The American innovation system. J Glob Econ 2018;06. doi: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000312.

11. Brás GR. Pillars of the Global Innovation Index by income level of economies: longitudinal data (2011-2022) for researchers’ use. Data Brief 2023;46:108818. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108818.

12. Popp D, Pless J, Haščič I, Johnstone N. 4. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector. The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, University of Chicago Press; 2022, p. 175–248. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226810645-006.

13. Pal A, Kakran S, Kumar A, Youssef AB, Singh UP, Sidhu A. Powering squarely into the future: A strategic analysis of hydrogen energy in QUAD nations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.169.

14. Ali W, Birdwell JE, Bowker K, Burke B, Flaum JA, Hammes U, et al. Energy and minerals division tight oil and gas committee activities and commodity report for 2020-2021. Unpublished; 2022. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27628.85125.

15. Vora S, Williams M. (Invited) The SOFC Program at the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) and National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). ECS Trans 2023;111:9. doi: 10.1149/11106.0009ecst.

16. Chien F, Ananzeh M, Mirza F, Bakar A, Vu HM, Ngo TQ. The effects of green growth, environmental-related tax, and eco-innovation towards carbon neutrality target in the US economy. J Environ Manage 2021;299:113633. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113633.

17. Kryukov VA. On the interconnection and interaction of economic, industrial and scientific-technological policies. Science management: theory and practice 2020;2:15–46. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.1.

18. Thune T, Engen OA, Wicken O. Petroleum Industry Transformations: Lessons from Norway and Beyond. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge; 2019. doi: 10.4324/9781315142456.

19. Høyland SA, Kjestveit K, Østgaard Skotnes R. Exploring the complexity of hydrogen perception and acceptance among key stakeholders in Norway. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:7896–908. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.144.

20. Espegren K, Damman S, Pisciella P, Graabak I, Tomasgard A. The role of hydrogen in the transition from a petroleum economy to a low-carbon society. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:23125–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.143.

21. Fu X, McKern B, Chen J. The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation. Oxford University Press; 2021. https://books.google.ru/books/about/The_Oxford_Handbook_of_China_Innovation.html?hl=&id=WxtJEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y [accessed 27 July 2023].

22. Wu K, Wang X. Studying financial aspect of green credit and regional heterogeneity on technology innovation in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28846-6.

23. Ma Q, Murshed M, Khan Z. The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy 2021;155:112345. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112345.

24. Liu L-J, Liu L-C, Liang Q-M. Restructuring investment to promote a win–win situation for both the economy and the environment in China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2023;182:113363. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113363.

25. Mohamued EA, Ahmed M, Pypłacz P, Liczmańska-Kopcewicz K, Khan MA. Global Oil Price and Innovation for Sustainability: The Impact of R&D Spending, Oil Price and Oil Price Volatility on GHG Emissions. Energies 2021;14:1757. doi: 10.3390/en14061757.

26. Filippov SP, Zhdaneev OV. Opportunities for the Application of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Technologies in Case of Global Economy Decarbonization (Review). Therm Eng 2022;69:637–52. doi: 10.1134/S0040601522090014.

27. Zhang K, Jin Z, Li G, Liu Q, Tian L. Gas adsorptions of geological carbon storage with enhanced gas recovery. Sep Purif Technol 2023;311:123260. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123260.

28. Wang L, Zhang Y, Zou R, Zou R, Huang L, Liu Y, et al. A systematic review of CO₂ injection for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage in shale reservoirs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.099.

29. Groenendijk DJ, Bouts S, van Wunnik JNM. Performance improvement of chemical enhanced oil recovery by divalent ion–complexing agents. J Pet Sci Eng 2022;215:110609. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110609.

30. Zhdaneev OV, Frolov KN. Drilling technology priorities in Russia (Russian). Oil Industry Journal 2020;2020:42–8. doi: 10.24887/0028-2448-2020-5-42-48.

31. van Oort E, Chen D, Ashok P, Fallah A. Constructing deep closed-loop geothermal wells for globally scalable energy production by leveraging oil and gas ERD and HPHT well construction expertise. Day 2 Tue, March 09, 2021, SPE; 2021. doi: 10.2118/204097-ms.

32. Tatur O, Petrakov Y, Sobolev A. Metrology and standardization in geomechanical modeling - A quantitative assessment of uncertainty window based on calibration data. Day 2 Wed, October 13, 2021, SPE; 2021. doi: 10.2118/206564-ms.

33. Wanasinghe TR, Wroblewski L, Petersen BK, Gosine RG, James LA, De Silva O, et al. Digital Twin for the Oil and Gas Industry: Overview, Research Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges. IEEE Access 2020;8:104175–97. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998723.

34. Meribout M, Azzi A, Ghendour N, Kharoua N, Khezzar L, AlHosani E. Multiphase Flow Meters Targeting Oil & Gas Industries. Measurement 2020;165:108111. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108111.

35. Pan B, Yin X, Zhu W, Yang Y, Ju Y, Yuan Y, et al. Theoretical study of brine secondary imbibition in sandstone reservoirs: Implications for H₂, CH₄, and CO₂ geo-storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:18058–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.275.

36. Kojima H, Nagasawa K, Todoroki N, Ito Y, Matsui T, Nakajima R. Influence of renewable energy power fluctuations on water electrolysis for green hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:4572–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.018.

37. Benkraiem R, Dubocage E, Lelong Y, Shuwaikh F. The effects of environmental performance and green innovation on corporate venture capital. Ecol Econ 2023;210:107860. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107860.

38. Dalla Fontana S, Nanda R. Innovating to Net Zero: Can Venture Capital and Start-Ups Play a Meaningful Role? Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy 2023;2:79–105. doi: 10.1086/723236.

39. Zhdaneev OV., Seregina AA. Staffing of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation in the conditions of energy transition. Moscow:Infra-M;2022. doi: 10.12737/1865411.

40. Bazhenov S, Dobrovolsky Y, Maximov A, Zhdaneev OV. Key challenges for the development of the hydrogen industry in the Russian Federation. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2022;54:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102867.