Preview

Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE)

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Universal regime criterion for supercritical heat transfer: Gusev criterion

https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2026.02.066-077

Abstract

Supercritical heat transfer plays a key role in hydrogen energy systems, supercritical CO₂ (sCO₂) cycles, methane-cracking reactors for carbon-free hydrogen production, as well as in high-temperature processes involving hydrocarbon liquids. In the vicinity of the pseudocritical temperature, fluids exhibit sharp nonlinear variations in heat capacity, density, and viscosity, which lead to the formation of enhanced, plateau, and deteriorated heat-transfer regimes. Classical dimensionless criteria (Re, Pr, Nu, Pe) are unable to predict these transitions because they do not account for the position of the wall temperature relative to the pseudocritical region and the associated local exergy losses.

A new regime criterion was developed by A. L. Gusev and later became known as the Gusev criterion due to its successful application in studies of supercritical hydrocarbon systems. This criterion provides a universal, local, and thermodynamically grounded description of supercritical heat-transfer regimes and is applicable to any fluid possessing a critical point.

The criterion is based on the author’s long-term research in exergy analysis, initiated in 1979 and further developed in the context of supercritical processes during 2005-2025. The Gusev criterion represents the culmination of decades of advancement in the exergy-based approach and constitutes a complete universal model of supercritical heat transfer.

The criterion predicts regime transitions, local wall-temperature maxima, and zones of deteriorated heat transfer. It performs correctly for hydrogen, CO₂, methane, hydrocarbon liquids, multicomponent mixtures, and reactive media. The Gusev criterion can be integrated into CFD models and digital twins of energy systems.

About the Author

A. L. Gusev
Fermaltech Montengro Limited; Farmaltech Limited; Institute of Hydrogen Economy
Russian Federation

Alexander Leonidovich Gusev is a prominent scientist in the fields of alternative energy and ecology, a former Soviet and Russian military design engineer and test specialist for advanced missile, space, and nuclear technologies. He is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of the International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE)

85310, Crna Gora, Budva, Jadransky Put, BB

8230, European Union, Bulgaria, Nessebar, Aphrodite Palace building, 1st floor

452613, Republic of Bashkortostan, Oktyabrsky, Yunosti Street, 18, room 1



References

1. . Krasnoshchekov, E. A. and Protopopov, V. S. (1960) About Heat Transfer in Flow of Carbon Dioxide and Water at Supercritical Region of State Parameters. Thermal Engineering, 10, 94.

2. . Ahn, Y. et al. Review of supercritical CO₂ power cycle technology and current status of research and development // Nuclear Engineering and Technology. – 2015; 47(6):647-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.06.009

3. . Bejan, A. Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 4th ed. Wiley, Hoboken. – 2016. ISBN: 9781119083955

4. . Bejan, A. Entropy Generation Minimization: The Method of Thermodynamic Optimization of Finite-Size Systems and Finite-Time Processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton. – 1996.

5. . Bishop, A. A., Sandberg, R. O. and Tong, L. S. Forced convection heat transfer to water at near-critical temperatures and supercritical pressures // ASME Journal of Heat Transfer. – 1964; 86(4):521-528.

6. . Dostal, V., Driscoll, M. J. and Hejzlar, P. A supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next generation nuclear reactors. MIT-ANP-TR-100, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. – 2004.

7. . Jackson, J. D. onsideration of the heat transfer properties of supercritical pressure fluids // Applied Thermal Engineering. – 2013; 54(2):441-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.013

8. . Kim, W. et al. Numerical investigation of heat transfer deterioration in supercritical fluids // International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. – 2018; 126:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.003

9. . Kotas, T. J. The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann, London. – 1985. ISBN: 9780408014022

10. . Leachman, J. W., Jacobsen, R. T., Penoncello, S. G. and Lemmon, E. W. Fundamental equations of state for parahydrogen, normal hydrogen, and orthohydrogen // Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. – 2009; 38(3):721-748. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3160306

11. . Matsuo, Y. et al. Heat transfer characteristics of supercritical hydrogen in cooling channels // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2019; 44(59):31523-31534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.020

12. . Mokry, S. et al. CFD modeling of supercritical water heat transfer // Nuclear Engineering and Design. – 2011; 241(5):1627-1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.02.014

13. . Muradov, N. Low/zero CO₂ production of hydrogen via thermocatalytic decomposition of methane // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2001; 26(11):1165-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00067-5

14. . Oka, Y. Supercritical Pressure Light Water Cooled Reactors // Elsevier, Amsterdam. – 2014. ISBN: 9780081001642

15. . Patankar, S. V. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Publishing, New York. – 1980.

16. . Pioro, I. and Duffey, R. Heat transfer and hydraulic resistance at supercritical pressures in power engineering applications // Heat Transfer Engineering. – 2007; 28(10):834-842. https://doi.rg/10.1080/01457630701328956

17. . Pioro, I. and Mokry, S. Thermophysical properties at critical and supercritical conditions // Nuclear Engineering and Design. – 2011; 241(5):1627-1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.02.014

18. . Zhang, J. et al. Heat transfer deterioration mechanisms of supercritical fluids: A review // International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. – 2018; 122:573-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.01.129

19. . Bulychev, N. A., Kazaryan, M. A., Averyushkin, A. S., Chernov, A. A. & Gusev, A. L. Hydrogen production by low-temperature plasma decomposition of liquids // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2017; 42(33):20934-20938.

20. . Gusev, A. L. Thermodynamic peculiarities of low-temperature regeneration of cryosorption devices in heat-insulation cavities of hydrogenous cryogenic tanks // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2001; 26(8):863-871.

21. . Gusev, A. L. Low-temperature sensors and hydrogen absorbers // Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE), Special Issue. – 2003; 110:172.

22. . Gusev, A. L. Cleaning system for corrosive gases and hydrogen // Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. – 2009; 45(9):640.

23. . Gusev, A. L., Belousov, V. M., Bacherikova, I. V., Lyashenko, L. V. & Rozhkova, E. V. Hydrogen sensor for cryogenic vacuum objects // Hydrogen Materials Science and Chemistry of Metal Hydrides. – 2002; 41-47.

24. . Gusev, A. L., Jabbarov, T. G., Mamedov, Sh. G., Malikov, R., Hajibalaev, N. M. et al. Production of hydrogen and carbon in the petrochemical industry by cracking of hydrocarbons in the process of heat utilization in steel production // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2023; 48(40):14954-14963.

25. . Nechaev, Y. S., Gusev, A. L., Gupta, B. K., Srivastava, O. N. & Veziroglu, T. N. On the experimental and theoretical basis developing a «super» hydrogen adsorbent. Transactions of the International Conference «Solid State Hydrogen Storage». – 2005; 40.

26. . Ufa, A. S., Malkova, Y. Y., Gusev, A. L., Ruban, N. Y. & Vasilev, A. S. Algorithm for optimal pairing of RES and hydrogen energy storage systems // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2021; 33659-33669.

27. . Ufa, A. S., Vasilev, A. S., Gusev, A. L., Malkova, Y. Y. et al. Analysis of the influence of the current-voltage characteristics of voltage rectifiers on the static characteristics of hydrogen electrolyzer load // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2021; 33670-33678.

28. . Zhiznin, S. Z., Timokhov, V. M. & Gusev, A. L. Economic aspects of nuclear and hydrogen energy in the world and Russia // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2020; 45(56):31353-31366.

29. . Zhiznin, S. Z., Vassilev, S. & Gusev, A. L. Economics of secondary renewable energy sources with hydrogen generation // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2019; 44(23):11385-11393.

30. . Zhiznin, S. Z., Timokhov, V. M. & Gusev, A. L. Economics of hydrogen energy of green transition in the world and Russia. Part I // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. – 2023; 48(57):21544-21567.

31. . Gusev, A. L. & Kazaryan, M. A. Hydrogen storage // Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). – 2007; 4.

32. . Goltsov, V. A., Veziroglu, T. N., Goltsova, L. F. & Gusev, A. L. Up-to-day status of hydrogen economy and hydrogen vehicles: economy, techniques, infrastructure // Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). – 2003; 18-19.

33. . Shalimov, Yu. N., Korol’kova, V. I., Budnik, A. P. & Gusev, A. L. Analysis of patents for airplane power units // Vestnik Mashinostroeniya. – 2019; 81-88.


Review

For citations:


Gusev A.L. Universal regime criterion for supercritical heat transfer: Gusev criterion. Alternative Energy and Ecology (ISJAEE). 2026;(2):66-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15518/isjaee.2026.02.066-077

Views: 68

JATS XML

ISSN 1608-8298 (Print)